Volume 9, Issue 4 (2018)
JMBS 2018, 9(4): 643-652 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shokrollahi S, Ghanati F, Hassan Sajedi R. Different Responses of Redox System of Glycine max to 20mT and 30mT Static Magnetic Fields. JMBS 2018; 9 (4) :643-652
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-12706-en.html
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-12706-en.html
1- Plant Biology Department, Biological Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Plant Biology Department, Biological Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, Tarbiat Modares University, Nasr Bridge, Jalal-Al-Ahmad Highway, Tehran, Iran , Ghangia@modares.ac.ir
3- Biochemistry Department, Biological Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2- Plant Biology Department, Biological Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, Tarbiat Modares University, Nasr Bridge, Jalal-Al-Ahmad Highway, Tehran, Iran , Ghangia@modares.ac.ir
3- Biochemistry Department, Biological Science Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (4712 Views)
Aims: As a naturally occurring environmental factor as well as an external factor resulting from burgeoning technology, static magnetic field (SMF) has considerable effects on plants physiology. The effects of SMF on production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown in plant cells. The aim of the present research was to evaluate the redox system responses of soybean (Glycine max) to different intensities of SMF.
Materials and Methods: In the present experimental research, M7 soybean seeds in their vegetative phase (14 days) were treated with 20 and 30mT SMF for 4 day, 5 hours daily. The experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design with factorial and at least 3 replications. The data were analyzed by SPSS software, using one-way ANOVA.
Findings: The treatment of 30mT resulted in a reduction in fresh weight, total antioxidant activity, and total regenerative capacity and increased hydrogen peroxide, but did not affect the total contents of phenolic compounds and flavonoids. In the treatment of 20mT, the level of peroxide decreased, but the fresh weight, hydroxyl radical level, antioxidant activity, total phenolic compound, and flavonoids contents increased. The amounts of Fe2+ decreased in 20mT but increased with 30mT.
Conclusion: In the Soybean redox system, SMF of 20mT leads the electrons toward useful redox compounds like phenolic compounds and results in growth stimulation, while SMF of 30mT leads the surplus electrons to destructive compounds such as Fe2+, which results in decrease of the plant growth.
Materials and Methods: In the present experimental research, M7 soybean seeds in their vegetative phase (14 days) were treated with 20 and 30mT SMF for 4 day, 5 hours daily. The experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design with factorial and at least 3 replications. The data were analyzed by SPSS software, using one-way ANOVA.
Findings: The treatment of 30mT resulted in a reduction in fresh weight, total antioxidant activity, and total regenerative capacity and increased hydrogen peroxide, but did not affect the total contents of phenolic compounds and flavonoids. In the treatment of 20mT, the level of peroxide decreased, but the fresh weight, hydroxyl radical level, antioxidant activity, total phenolic compound, and flavonoids contents increased. The amounts of Fe2+ decreased in 20mT but increased with 30mT.
Conclusion: In the Soybean redox system, SMF of 20mT leads the electrons toward useful redox compounds like phenolic compounds and results in growth stimulation, while SMF of 30mT leads the surplus electrons to destructive compounds such as Fe2+, which results in decrease of the plant growth.
Article Type: Research Paper |
Subject:
Agricultural Biotechnology
Received: 2016/10/5 | Accepted: 2018/02/1 | Published: 2018/12/21
Received: 2016/10/5 | Accepted: 2018/02/1 | Published: 2018/12/21
References
1. Maffei ME. Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:445. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpls.2014.00445]
2. Blumenthal NC, Ricci J, Breger L, Zychlinsky A, Solomon H, Chen GG, et al. Effects of low-intensity AC and/or DC electromagnetic fields on cell attachment and induction of apoptosis. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(3):264-72.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1997)18:3<264::AID-BEM10>3.0.CO;2-P [Link] [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1997)18:33.0.CO;2-P]
3. Kopczewski T, Kuźniak E. Redox signals as a language of interorganellar communication in plant cells. Cent Eur J Biol. 2013;8(12):1153-63. [Link] [DOI:10.2478/s11535-013-0243-4]
4. Blokhina O, Fagerstedt KV. Oxidative metabolism, ROS and NO under oxygen deprivation. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(5):359-73. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.01.007]
5. Potters G, Horemans N, Jansen MA. The cellular redox state in plant stress biology--a charging concept. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(5):292-300. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.12.007]
6. Xia L, Guo J. Effect of magnetic field on peroxidase activation and isozyme in Leymus chinensis. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2000;11(5):699-702. [Chinese] [Link]
7. Sahebjamei H, Abdolmaleki P, Ghanati F. Effects of magnetic field on the antioxidant enzyme activities of suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2007;28(1):42-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/bem.20262]
8. Yano A, Ohashi Y, Hirasaki T, Fujiwara K. Effects of a 60 Hz magnetic field on photosynthetic CO2 uptake and early growth of radish seedlings. Bioelectromagnetics. 2004;25(8):572-81. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/bem.20036]
9. Eşitken A, Turan M. Alternating magnetic field effects on yield and plant nutrient element composition of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa cv. camarosa). Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci. 2004;54(3):135-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/09064710310019748]
10. Carbonell V, Flórez M, Martínez E, Maqueda R, Amaya JM. Study of stationary magnetic fields on initial growth of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seeds. Seed Sci Technol. 2011;39(3):673-9. [Link] [DOI:10.15258/sst.2011.39.3.15]
11. Vashisth A, Nagarajan S. Exposure of seeds to static magnetic field enhances germination and early growth characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bioelectromagnetics. 2008;29(7):571-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1002/bem.20426]
12. Payez A, Ghanati F, Behmanesh M, Abdolmaleki P, Hajnorouzi A, Rajabbeigi E. Increase of seed germination, growth and membrane integrity of wheat seedlings by exposure to static and a 10-KHz electromagnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(4):417-29. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/15368378.2012.735625]
13. Rajabbeigi E, Ghanati F, Abdolmaleki P, Payez A. Antioxidant capacity of parsley cells (Petroselinum crispum L.) in relation to iron-induced ferritin levels and static magnetic field. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(4):430-41. [Link] [DOI:10.3109/15368378.2012.736441]
14. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. C347th Volume. Berkeley: College of Agriculture, University of California; 1950. p. 34. [Link]
15. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28(3):350-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/ac60111a017]
16. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans. 1983;11(5):591-2. [Link] [DOI:10.1042/bst0110591]
17. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000;151(1):59-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00197-1]
18. Tiedemann AV. Evidence for a primary role of active oxygen species in induction of host cell death during infection of bean leaves with Botrytis cinerea. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1997;50(3):151-66. [Link] [DOI:10.1006/pmpp.1996.0076]
19. Hajnorouzi A, Vaezzadeh M, Ghanati F, Jamnezhad H, Nahidian B. Growth promotion and a decrease of oxidative stress in maize seedlings by a combination of geomagnetic and weak electromagnetic fields. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168(10):1123-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jplph.2010.12.003]
20. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilsizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1-2):248-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3]
21. Cakmak I, Horst WJ. Effect of aluminium on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiologia Plantarum. 1991;83(3):463-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb00121.x]
22. Abdolmaleki P, Ghanati F, Sahebjamei H, Sabet Sarvestani A. Peroxidase activity, lignification and promotion of cell death in tobacco cells exposed to static magnetic field. Environ. 2007;27(4):435-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10669-007-9080-1]
23. Pirie A, Mullins MG. Changes in anthocyanin and phenolics content of grapevine leaf and fruit tissues treated with sucrose, nitrate, and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 1976;58(4):468-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1104/pp.58.4.468]
24. Krizek DT, Britz SJ, Mirecki RM. Inhibitory effects of ambient levels of solar UV-A and UV-B radiation on growth of cv, new red fire lettuce. Physiologia Plantarum. 1998;103(1):1-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1030101.x]
25. Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reaction--antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine. Jpn J Nutr (Eiyogaku zasshi). 1986;44(6):307-15. [Japanese] [Link] [DOI:10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307]
26. Katyal JC, Sharma BD. A new technique of plant analysis to resolve iron chlorosis. Plant Soil. 1980;55(1):105-19. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02149714]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |