United Nation. Science, technology and innovation policy review- Islamic Republic of Iran. New York & Geneva: United Nation; 2016. [
Link]
Chiekezie O, Nzewi H, Ikon MA, Chiekezie Ch. A review of entrepreneurship development in Japan, south Africa and Malaysia: Lessons for Nigeria. Int J Innov Res Dev.2015;4(2):129-35. [
Link]
Forkuoh SK, Li Y, Affum-Osei E, Quaye I. Informal financial services, a panacea for SMEs financing? A case study of SMEs in the Ashanti Region of Ghana. Am J Ind Bus Manag. 2015;5(12):779-93. [
Link] [
DOI:10.4236/ajibm.2015.512075]
Bronzini R, Iachini E. Are incentives for R&D effective? Evidence from a regression discontinuity approach. Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2014;6(4):100-34. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1257/pol.6.4.100]
Marandi V, Tabatabaeian SH, Jafari P, Azarnoosh M. An analysis on technological innovation system regarding Iranian bio-products (focused on human vaccines). Innov Manag J. 2017;6(3):1-26. [Persian] [
Link]
Hysing E. From government to governance? A comparison of environmental governing in Swedish forestry and transport. Governance. 2009;22(4):647-72. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01457.x]
Corchuelo B, Martínez Ros E. The effects of fiscal incentives for R & D in Spain. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid; 2009 March. [
Link]
Köhler C, Laredo P, Rammer C. The impact and effectiveness of fiscal incentives for R&D. In: Edler J, Cunningham P, Gök A, Shapira P, editors. Handbook of innovation policy impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2012. [
Link]
Saadat S, Karimi-Jashni A. Optimization of Pb (II) adsorption onto modified walnut shells using factorial design and simplex methodologies. Chem Eng J. 2011;173(3):743-9. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2011.08.042]
Geyikci F, Büyükgüngör H. Factorial experimental design for adsorption silver ions from water onto montmorillonite. Acta Geodyn Geomater. 2013;10(3):363-70. [
Link] [
DOI:10.13168/AGG.2013.0035]
Peters GT, Kiabel BD. Tax incentives and foreign direct investment in Nigeria. IOSR J Econ Financ. 2015;6(5):10-20. [
Link]
Castellacci F, Lie MC. Do the effects of R&D tax credits vary across industries? A meta-regression analysis. Res Policy. 2015;44(4):819-32. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.010]
Larédo P, Köhler C, Rammer C. The impact of fiscal incentives for R&D. In: Edler J, Cunningham P, Gök A, Shapira P, editors. Handbook of innovation policy impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016. pp. 18-53. [
Link]
Technopolic Group & Mioir. Evaluation of innovation activities: Guidance on methods and practices. Brussels: European Commission; 2012. [
Link]
Radicic D, Pugh G, Hollanders H, Wintjes R, Fairburn J. The impact of innovation support programs on small and medium enterprises innovation in traditional manufacturing industries: An evaluation for seven European :union: regions. Environ Plan C Gov Policy. 2016;34(8):1425-52. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1177/0263774X15621759]
Edler J, Shapira Ph, Cunningham P, Gök A. Evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy intervention. In: Edler J, Cunningham P, Gök A, Shapira P, editors. Handbook of innovation policy impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016. pp. 543-56. [
Link] [
DOI:10.4337/9781784711856]
Buisseret TJ, Cameron HM, Georghiou L. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. Int J Technol Manag. 1995;10(4-6):587-600. [
Link]
Afcha S, García-Quevedo J. The impact of R&D subsidies on R&D employment composition. Ind Corp Chang. 2014;25(6):955-75. [
Link] [
DOI:10.7835/ccwp-2014-11-0003]
Iran University of Science and Technology. Protection act for knowledge-based companies and institutions and the commercialisation of inventions [Internet]. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology; 2010 [cited 2018 December 12]. Available from: https://b2n.ir/788962. [Persian] [
Link]
Sprent P. Frank Yates and experimental design-reflections inspired by his selected papers. J R Stat Soc.1973;22(2):151-8. [
Link] [
DOI:10.2307/2987367]
Preece DA. R. A. Fisher and experimental design: A review. Biometrics. 1990;46(4):925-35. [
Link] [
DOI:10.2307/2532438]
Gilmour SG, Trinca LA. Optimum design of experiments for statistical inference. J R Stat Soc. 2012;61(3):345-401. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.01000.x]
DeGlopper DR. The art of computer systems performance analysis: Techniques for experimental design, measurement, simulation and modeling. Int Leg Inf. 1992;20(1):63-4. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1017/S0731126500010933]
Jensen WA. Design and analysis of experiments by Douglas Montgomery: A supplement for using JMP. J Qual Technol. 2017;46(2):181. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1080/00224065.2014.11917962]
Assessment and Qualificationof Knowledge Based firms Committee. Assessing the implementation of supporting knowledge- based firms law [Internet]. Tehran: Vice Presidency for Science and Technology; 2016 [cited 2018 December 12]. Available from: http://daneshbonyan.isti.ir/index.aspx?pageid=2994. [Persian] [
Link]
Duguet E. The effect of the incremental R&D tax credit on the private funding of R&D an econometric evaluation on French firm level data. Revue D'économie Politique. 2012;122(3):405-35. [
Link] [
DOI:10.3917/redp.223.0405]
Lokshin B, Mohnen P. How effective are level-based R&D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Appl Econ. 2012;44(12):1527-38. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1080/00036846.2010.543083]
García‐Quevedo J. Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta‐analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos. 2004;57(1):87-102. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00244.x]
Cunningham P, Gök A, Larédo P. The impact of direct support to R&D and innovation in firms. In: Edler J, Cunningham P, Gök A, Shapira P, editors. Handbook of innovation policy impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016. pp. 54-107. [
Link]
Goolsbee A. Investment tax incentives, prices, and the supply of capital goods. Q J Econ. 1998;113(1):121-48. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1162/003355398555540]
Tabatabaeian SH, Tahoori HR, Taghva MR, Taghavi Fard SM. Analysis of innovation ecosystem of Iranian biopharmaceuticals. J Technol Dev Manag. 2018;6(1):9-45. [Persian] [
Link]
Falk R. Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms' innovation activities: Survey evidence from Austria. Res Policy. 2007;36(5):665-79. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.005]
Autio E, Kanninen S, Gustafsson R. First-and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs. Res Policy. 2008;37(1):59-76. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.012]
Clarysse B, Wright M, Mustar P. Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Res Policy. 2009;38(10):1517-33. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003]
Arqué-Castells P, Mohnen P. Sunk costs, extensive R&D subsidies and permanent inducement effects. J Ind Econ. 2015;63(3):458-94. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1111/joie.12078]
Gok A, Edler J. The use of behavioural additionality in innovation policy-making. Res Eval. 2012;21(4):306-18. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1093/reseval/rvs015]
Guellec D, Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie B. The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Econ Innov New Technol. 2003;12(3):225-43. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1080/10438590290004555]
Bérubé Ch, Mohnen P. Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative?. Can J Econ. 2009;42(1):206-25. [
Link] [
DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.01505.x]
