1. Moradkhani, M., Vahidi, B. & Ahmadian, B. Finite element study of stem cells under fluid flow for mechanoregulation toward osteochondral cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Med, 2021. 32 (7), P. 1-10.
2. Ali, D. and S. Sen, Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: computational fluid dynamic analysis using Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow models. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2018. 99: p. 201-208.
3. Giannitelli, S., et al., Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta biomaterialia, 2014. 10(2).
4. Eghbali, H., et al., An experimental-numerical investigation on the effects of macroporous scaffold geometry on cell culture parameters. The International journal of artificial organs, 2017. 40(4): p. 185-195.
5. Hendrikson, W.J., et al., Influence of additive manufactured scaffold architecture on the distribution of surface strains and fluid flow shear stresses and expected osteochondral cell differentiation. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2017. 5: p. 6.
6. Boschetti, F., et al., Prediction of the micro-fluid dynamic environment imposed to three-dimensional engineered cell systems in bioreactors. Journal of biomechanics, 2006. 39(3): p. 418-425.
7. Malvè, M., D. Bergstrom, and X. Chen, Modeling the flow and mass transport in a mechanically stimulated parametric porous scaffold under fluid-structure interaction approach. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018. 96: p. 53-60.
8. Zhao, F., T.J. Vaughan, and L.M. Mcnamara, Multiscale fluid–structure interaction modelling to determine the mechanical stimulation of bone cells in a tissue engineered scaffold. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2015. 14(2): p. 231-243.
9. Zhao, F., T.J. Vaughan, and L.M. McNamara, Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2016. 15(3): p. 561-577..
10. Chen, G., et al., Responses of MSCs to 3D scaffold matrix mechanical properties under oscillatory perfusion culture. ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2017. 9(2): p. 1207-1218.
11. Zadpoor, A.A., Bone tissue regeneration: the role of scaffold geometry. Biomaterials science, 2015. 3(2): p. 231-245.
12. Zhao, F., T.J. Vaughan, and L.M. McNamara, Quantification of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with spherical and cubical pore architectures. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2016. 15(3): p. 561-577.
13. Vaughan, T., M. Haugh, and L. McNamara, A fluid–structure interaction model to characterize bone cell stimulation in parallel-plate flow chamber systems. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 2013. 10(81): p. 20120900.
14. Vaez Ghaemi, R., et al., Fluid–Structure Interactions Analysis of Shear‐Induced Modulation of a Mesenchymal Stem Cell: An Image‐Based Study. Artificial Organs, 2016. 40(3): p. 278-287.
15. Abbasszadeh Rad, A. and B. Vahidi, The Effect of the Kind of Attachment of Primary Cilium to Cell in Its Response to the Fluid Flow: A 3D Computational Simulation. Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics, 2018. 8(1 #HD00105): p. -.
16. Pritchard, P.J. and J.W. Mitchell, Fox and McDonald's introduction to fluid mechanics. 2016: John Wiley & Sons.
17. Rad, A.A. and B. Vahidi, A finite elements study on the role of primary cilia in sensing mechanical stimuli to cells by calculating their response to the fluid flow. Journal of Computational Applied Mechanics, 2016. 47(1): p. 35-44.
18. Abbasszadeh Rad, A.H. and B. Vahidi, The Effect of the Kind of Attachment of Primary Cilium to Cell in Its Response to the Fluid Flow: A 3D Computational Simulation. Journal of Solid and Fluid Mechanics, 2018. 8(1): p. 203-213.
19. Olivares, A.L., et al., Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2009. 30(30): p. 6142-6149.
20. Murphy, C.M., et al., Cell-scaffold interactions in the bone tissue engineering triad. Eur Cell Mater, 2013. 26(4): p. 120-132.
21. Murphy, C.M., et al., Mesenchymal stem cell fate is regulated by the composition and mechanical properties of collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2012. 11: p. 53-62.
22. McCoy, R.J., C. Jungreuthmayer, and F.J. O'Brien, Influence of flow rate and scaffold pore size on cell behavior during mechanical stimulation in a flow perfusion bioreactor. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2012. 109(6): p. 1583-1594.