Volume 10, Issue 1 (2019)
JMBS 2019, 10(1): 1-7 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Abbaszadeh S, Bakhtiari N, Amin-Bayat Z. Optimized Solubilization and Purification of Recombinant Teriparatide Fusion Protein Expressed in E. coli. JMBS 2019; 10 (1) :1-7
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-12807-en.html
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-12807-en.html
1- Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran, Research Complex of the Age of Revolution, End of Enghelab Street, Ahmad Abad Mostofi, Azadegan Highway, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 3313193685 ,nbakhtiari@irost.ir
2- Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran, Research Complex of the Age of Revolution, End of Enghelab Street, Ahmad Abad Mostofi, Azadegan Highway, Tehran, Iran. Postal Code: 3313193685 ,
Abstract: (11532 Views)
Aims: There are several cell disruption methods for intracellular protein extraction. The aim of this study was to select the best approach for recombinant teriparatide fusion protein extraction from E. coli and achieve the best purification conditions.
Materials & Methods: In this experimental research, bacterial cells were disrupted by different methods such as sonication in different cycles, grinding with liquid nitrogen in two different cell culture volumes, and homogenization at two different pressures. The supernatant and pellet samples were run on sodium dodecyl sulphate gel. All the cell lysates were cultured on LB agar medium and stained with Gram staining method. The Ni2+ affinity chromatography of recombinant teriparatide fusion protein was done under denaturing and non-denaturing conditions, using pH and imidazole concentration gradient, respectively. All samples were taken on sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel and the amount of purified protein was calculated by Micro-Bradford assay.
Findings: In the 20 and 25 cycles, a large part of the fusion protein led to protein solubilization. In the method of grinding with liquid nitrogen, proteins were more likely to enter the sediment part. The cell disruption was complete in a chemical method. The cell disruption under 50bar homogenization was more than that of 15bar. In chemical degradation and sonication, a large amount of fusion protein led to protein solubilization. In non-denaturing conditions, no recombinant fusion protein was removed from the column with the isolation buffer, but in the denaturing conditions, a large amount of proteins was purified.
Conclusion: The combined method of chemical degradation and sonication leads to approximately 97.7% of protein solubilization, and the purification in denaturing condition has also the suitable result in contrast to non-denaturing condition.
Materials & Methods: In this experimental research, bacterial cells were disrupted by different methods such as sonication in different cycles, grinding with liquid nitrogen in two different cell culture volumes, and homogenization at two different pressures. The supernatant and pellet samples were run on sodium dodecyl sulphate gel. All the cell lysates were cultured on LB agar medium and stained with Gram staining method. The Ni2+ affinity chromatography of recombinant teriparatide fusion protein was done under denaturing and non-denaturing conditions, using pH and imidazole concentration gradient, respectively. All samples were taken on sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel and the amount of purified protein was calculated by Micro-Bradford assay.
Findings: In the 20 and 25 cycles, a large part of the fusion protein led to protein solubilization. In the method of grinding with liquid nitrogen, proteins were more likely to enter the sediment part. The cell disruption was complete in a chemical method. The cell disruption under 50bar homogenization was more than that of 15bar. In chemical degradation and sonication, a large amount of fusion protein led to protein solubilization. In non-denaturing conditions, no recombinant fusion protein was removed from the column with the isolation buffer, but in the denaturing conditions, a large amount of proteins was purified.
Conclusion: The combined method of chemical degradation and sonication leads to approximately 97.7% of protein solubilization, and the purification in denaturing condition has also the suitable result in contrast to non-denaturing condition.
Subject:
Agricultural Biotechnology
Received: 2016/10/16 | Accepted: 2018/09/16 | Published: 2019/03/16
Received: 2016/10/16 | Accepted: 2018/09/16 | Published: 2019/03/16
References
1. Harrison ST. Bacterial cell disruption: A key unit operation in the recovery of intracellular products. Biotechnol Adv. 1991;9(2):217-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0734-9750(91)90005-G]
2. Sattayasai N. Protein purification. In: Ekinci D, editor. Chemical biology. London: IntechOpen; 2012. p. 444. [Link] [DOI:10.5772/35425]
3. Peternel Š. Bacterial cell disruption: A crucial step in protein production. N Biotechnol. 2013;30(2):250-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.nbt.2011.09.005]
4. Peternel Š, Bele M, Gaberc-Porekar V, Menart V. Nonclassical inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Factories. 2006;5(Suppl 1):P23.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-5-23
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-5-S1-S23 [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1475-2859-5-S1-P23]
5. Magdeldin S, Moser A. Affinity chromatography: Principles and applications. In: Magdeldin S, editor. Affinity chromatography. London: IntechOpen; 2012. p. 368.
https://doi.org/10.5772/1959 [Link] [DOI:10.5772/39087]
6. Yip TT, William Hutchens T. Metal ion affinity adsorption of a Zn (II)-transport protein present in maternal plasma during lactation: Structural characterization and identification as histidine-rich glycoprotein. Protein Expr Purif. 1991;2(5-6):355-62. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/1046-5928(91)90094-Y]
7. Porath J, Olin B. Immobilized metal ion affinity adsorption and immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography of biomaterials, serum protein affinities for gel-immobilized iron and nickel ions. Biochemistry. 1983;22(7):1621-30. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/bi00276a015]
8. Bornhorst JA, Falke JJ. Purification of proteins using polyhistidine affinity tags. Methods Enzymol. 2000;326:245-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0076-6879(00)26058-8]
9. Bakhtiari N, Amini Bayat Z, Sagharidouz S, Vaez M. Overexpression of recombinant human teriparatide, rhP TH (1-34) in Escherichia coli: An innovative gene fusion approach. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2017;9(1):19-22. [Link]
10. Amini Bayat Z, Shame Riz Sh. Soluble protein production methods. 1st Volume. Tehran: Iideh Negar; 2015. [Persian] [Link]
11. Tsumoto K, Ejima D, Kumagai I, Arakawa T. Practical considerations in refolding proteins from inclusion bodies. Protein Expr Purif. 2003;28(1):1-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1046-5928(02)00641-1]
12. Loughran ST, Bree RT, Walls D. Purification of polyhistidine-tagged proteins. In: Walls D, Loughran S, editors. Protein chromatography, methods in molecular biology. 1485th Volume. New York: Humana Press; 2017. pp. 275-303. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-6412-3_14]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |