Volume 10, Issue 2 (2019)                   JMBS 2019, 10(2): 173-181 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rashidi S, Abdollahi M, Sarikhani H, Moosavi S. Investigation of the Effect of Centrifugation and Electrical Shock Pretreatments on the Androgenesis Efficiency in Chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.) Anther Culture. JMBS 2019; 10 (2) :173-181
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-17372-en.html
1- Agronomy & Plant Breeding Department, Agriculture Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2- Agronomy & Plant Breeding Department, Agriculture Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran, Agronomy & Plant Breeding Department, Agriculture Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. Postal Code: 657833131 , m.abdollahi@basu.ac.ir
3- Horticultural Sciences Department, Agriculture Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
Abstract:   (7678 Views)
The production of double haploid plants can be used as an effective method for plant breeding. In this research, in order to produce chickpea haploid plants, 1mm-long anthers of Bivanij cultivar containing the microspores at uni-nucleate stage were isolated from suitable buds (3mm in length) and exposed to different centrifuge (150g, 300g and 600g each for 3, 6 and 10 minutes) and electrical shock pretreatments (0, 100, 150 and 200V) in the 2ml microtubes containing 1.5ml of RM-IK medium. The treated anthers were then cultured in an EDM culture medium containing 10mg/l 2, 4-D and 10mg/l silver nitrate to induce callus and embryos. Results showed significant differences between different levels of centrifugation, different levels of electric shock and their interactions for the studied traits. The highest percentage of embryogenesis was observed in centrifuge pretreatments of 150g for 6 minutes, 300g for 3 minutes, 150g for 3 minutes in combination with 150V electrical shock, 300g for 6 and 10 minutes and combination of 150g centrifuge pretreatment for 3 minutes with electric shock of 200V, while the highest percentage of plant regeneration was obtained from centrifuge pretreatment of 300g for 6 minutes and also the combination of centrifuge pretreatment of 150g for 3 minutes with electric shock of 150V.
Full-Text [PDF 571 kb]   (2786 Downloads)    
Article Type: _ | Subject: Agricultural Biotechnology
Received: 2017/09/4 | Accepted: 2018/02/17 | Published: 2019/06/20

References
1. Kochaki A, Banayan M. Pulse crops. Mashhad: Javid; 1989. [Persian] [Link]
2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of food and agriculture [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2016 [cited 2016 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdf [Link]
3. Grewal RK, Lulsdorf M, Croser J, Ochatt S, Vandenberg A, Warkentin TD. Doubled-haploid production in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): Role of stress treatments. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28(8):1289-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00299-009-0731-1]
4. Krishnamurthy KV, Suhasini K, Sagare AP, Meixner M, De Kathen A, Pickardt T, et al. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) embryo axes. Plant Cell Rep. 2000;19(3);235-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s002990050005]
5. Maluszynki M, Szarejko I, Barriga P, Balcerzyk A. Heterosis in crop mutant crosses and production of high yielding lines using doubled haploid systems. Euphytica. 2001;120(3);387-98. [Link] [DOI:10.1023/A:1017569617715]
6. Kumar DK. An introduction to plant tissue culture. Kolkata: New Central Book LTD; 1995. p. 185. [Link]
7. Mohan Jain S, Sopory SK, Veilleux R, editors. In vitro haploid production in higher plants, volume 4: Cereals. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996. [Link]
8. Pierik RLM. In vitro culture of higher plants. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-009-3621-8]
9. University of Guelph. Haploids in higher plants: Advances and potential: Proceedings of the first international symposium, Guelph, Ontario, Canada June 10 to 14, 1974. Kasha KJ, editor. Guelph: University of Guelph; 1974. p.421. [Link]
10. Croser JS, Lülsdorf MM, Davies PA, Clarke HJ, Bayliss KL, Mallikarjuna N, et al. Toward doubled haploid production in the fabaceae: Progress, constraints, and opportunities. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2006;25(2):139-57. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/07352680600563850]
11. Bobkov SV. Isolated pea anther culture. Russ Agric Sci. 2010;36(6):413-6. [Link] [DOI:10.3103/S1068367410060078]
12. Bobkov S. Obtaining calli and regenerated plants in anther cultures of pea. Czech J Genet Plant Breed. 2014;50(2):123-29. [Link] [DOI:10.17221/137/2013-CJGPB]
13. Germanà MA. Anther culture for haploid and doubled haploid production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011;104(3):283-300. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11240-010-9852-z]
14. Shariatpanahi ME, Bal U, Heberle-Bors E, Touraev A. Stresses applied for the re-programming of plant microspores towards in vitro embryogenesis. Physiologia Plantarum. 2006;127(4);519-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00675.x]
15. Ochatt S, Pech C, Grewal R, Conreux C, Lulsdorf M, Jacas L. Abiotic stress enhances androgenesis from isolated microspores of some legume species (Fabaceae). J Plant Physiol. 2009;166(12):1314-28. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jplph.2009.01.011]
16. Tanaka M. The effect of centrifugal treatment on the emergence of plantlet from cultured anther of tobacco. Jpn J Breed. 1973;23(4):171-4. [Japanese] [Link] [DOI:10.1270/jsbbs1951.23.171]
17. Sangwan-Norreel BS. Androgenic stimulating factors in the anther and isolated pollen grain culture of datura innoxia mill. J Exp Bot. 1977;28(105):843-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/jxb/28.4.843]
18. Panchangam SS, Mallikarjuna N, Gaur PM, Suravajhala P. Androgenesis in chickpea: Anther culture and expressed sequence tags derived annotation. Indian J Exp Biol. 2014;52(2):181-8. [Link]
19. Abdollahi MR, Rashidi Sh. Production and conversion of haploid embryos in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) anther cultures using high 2,4-D and silver nitrate containing media. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018;133(1):39-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11240-017-1359-4]
20. Jahangiri A, Hagh Parast R, Sabagh Nia N, Moradi N, Yavari I, Sadegh Zade Ahari D, et al. pea guide (Planting, growing, harvesting). Karaj: Agricultural Research Education and Extention Organization; 2015. [Persain] [Link]
21. Sharma AK, Sharma A. Chromosome techniques: Theory and practice. London: Butterworths; 1972. p. 575. [Link]
22. Rech EL, Ochatt SJ, Chand PK, Power JB, Davey MR. Electro-enhancement of division of plant protoplast-derived cells. Protoplasma. 1987;141(2-3);169-76. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF01272899]
23. Ochatt SJ, Chand PK, Rech EL, Davey MR, Power JB. Electroporation-mediated improvement of plant regeneration from colt cherry (Prunus avium × pseudocerasus) protoplasts. Plant Sci. 1988;54(2);165-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/0168-9452(88)90096-9]
24. Delaitre C, Ochatt S, Deleury E. Electroporation modulates the embryogenic responses of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L.) microspores. Protoplasma. 2001;216(1-2):39-46. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02680129]
25. Mohan Jain S, Sopory SK, Veilleux R, editors. In vitro haploid production in higher plants: Volume 5 - oil, ornamental and miscellaneous plants. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997. p. 258. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.