Volume 9, Issue 2 (2018)                   JMBS 2018, 9(2): 309-315 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rashedi H, Farmani F, Yazdian F, Motevaselin M. Comparative Assessment of Crude Oil Biodegradation by Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus RAG-1 in the Presence and Absence of Biofunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles. JMBS 2018; 9 (2) :309-315
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-14536-en.html
1- Chemical Engineering School, Chemical Engineering College, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, Chemical Engineering School, Chemical Engineering College, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , hrashedi@ut.ac.ir
2- Chemical Engineering School, Chemical Engineering College, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3- Life Sciences Engineering Department, New Sciences & Technologies Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3120 Views)
Aims: The effect of crude oil pollutants on water and soil pollution and ecological changes has resulted in several studies on the identification and removal of these pollutants. The biological methods have been highly regarded for controlling this type of pollution due to their optimal performance. The aim of this study was the comparative assessment of crude oil biodegradation by Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus RAG-1 in the presence and absence of biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles.
Materials and Methods: In this laboratory research, the amount of degradation of N-decane and Hexadecane were studied, as indices of normal paraffins in crude oil pollutions, by Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus RAG-1 in the optimal conditions, which Emulsan produced. Also, the effect of magnetic nanoparticles of iron oxide coated with two layers of Decanoic acid on the degradation was investigated separately. The independent t-test was performed to examine the significance of the model parameters and the two-way ANOVA was used to examine the goodness of fit. The experiment was done with a fractional factorial design. For statistical analysis of the results, Minitab V.16 software was used.
Findings: The biodegradation of N-decane and Hexadecane were obtained 85% and 86%, respectively, after 60 days. The presence of nanoparticles also led to an improvement in the biodegradation process and an increase of 91% and 89%, respectively.
Conclusion: Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus RAG- succeeds in eliminating paraffinic compounds from crude oil with medium chain length. The effect of presence of nanoparticle in the biodegradation of N-decane is greater than that of Hexadecane.
Full-Text [PDF 678 kb]   (3789 Downloads)    
Article Type: Research Paper | Subject: Agricultural Biotechnology
Received: 2015/12/21 | Accepted: 2017/07/24 | Published: 2018/06/21

1. Hanbing Q, Jie L, Dong L. A review of petroleum pollutant migration in the permafrost environment. Phys Numer Simul Geotech Eng. 2015;(18):95-9. [Link]
2. Shukla KP, Singh NK, Sharma S. Bioremediation: Developments, current practices and perspectives. Genet Eng Biotechnol J. 2010;2010:GEBJ-3. [Link]
3. Salihu A, Abdulkadir I, Almustapha MN. An investigation for potential development on biosurfactants. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev. 2009;3(5):111-7. [Link]
4. Margesin R, Schinner F. Bioremediation (natural attenuation and biostimulation) of diesel-oil-contaminated soil in an alpine glacier skiing area. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(7):3127-33. [Link] [DOI:10.1128/AEM.67.7.3127-3133.2001]
5. Cookson J. Bioremediation engineering: Design and application. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 1995. [Link]
6. Ruffini Castiglione M, Giorgetti L, Becarelli S, Siracusa G, Lorenzi R, Di Gregorio S. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soils: bioaugmentation of autochthonous bacteria and toxicological assessment of the bioremediation process by means of Vicia faba L. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(8):7930-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11356-016-6049-y]
7. Singh P, Parmar D, Pandya A. Comparative study of crude oil degradation efficiency of microbes isolated from crude oil contaminated site. Bull Env Pharmacol Life Sci. 2015;4(2):91-4. [Link]
8. Eskandari S. Optimize the production of emulsants By A.calcoaceticus RAG-1 bacteria [Dissertation]. Tehran: Amirkabir University of Technology; 2007. [Persian] [Link]
9. Mujumdar S, Bhandari T, Atre C. Industrial and biological applications of bioemulsifiers: A mini review. J Biomed Pharm Res.2015;4(4):26-35. [Link]
10. Mnif I, Ghribi D. High molecular weight bioemulsifiers, main properties and potential environmental and biomedical applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31(5):691-706. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11274-015-1830-5]
11. Zou C, Wang M, Xing Y, Lan G, Ge T, Yan X, et al. Characterization and optimization of biosurfactants produced by Acinetobacter baylyi ZJ2 isolated from crude oil-contaminated soil sample toward microbial enhanced oil recovery applications. Biochem Eng J. 2014;90:49-58. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2014.05.007]
12. Rashedi H, Mazaheri Assadi M, Tabatabaee Bafrouee A. Indigenous production of biosurfactant and degradation of crude oil by Bacillus sp. Adv Environ Technol. 2015;1(1):11-6. [Link]
13. Kang Z. Mechanical properties of hexadecane-water interfaces with adsorbed hydrophobic bacteria [Dissertation]. Edmonton: University of Alberta; 2009. [Link]
14. Dorobantu LS. Analysis of bacterial surface properties using atomic force microscopy [Dissertation]. Edmonton: University of Alberta; 2009. [Link]
15. Desai JD, Banat IM. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61(1):47-64. [Link]
16. Ron EZ, Rosenberg E. Biosurfactants and oil bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002;13(3):249-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00316-6]
17. Shen L, Laibinis PE, Hatton TA. Bilayer surfactant stabilized magnetic fluids: synthesis and interactions at interfaces. Langmuir. 1999;15(2):447-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1021/la9807661]
18. Amin MM, Salehi P, Teimouri F, Kalteh T. Bioremediation of soils polluted with phenanthrene and anthracene using ground treatment method and chicken manure as a cosubstrate. J Environ Health Sustain Dev. 2017; 2(3):348-56. [Link]
19. Zhao F, Zhang J, Shi R, Han S, Ma F, Zhang Y. Production of biosurfactant by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolate and its applicability to in situ microbial enhanced oil recovery under anoxic conditions. RSC Adv. 2015; 45;36044-50. [Link] [DOI:10.1039/C5RA03559G]
20. Rashedi H, Mazaheri Assadi M, Jamshidi E, Bonakdarpour B. Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa growing on carbon sources. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2006;3(3):297-303. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF03325937]
21. Rashedi H, Jamshidi E, Mazaheri Assadi M, Bonakdarpour B. Biosurfactant production with glucose as a carbon source. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2006;20(1):99-106. [Link]
22. Bagheri Lotfabad T, Partovi M, Bahmaei M. Rhamnolipid biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa MR01 using vegetable oil refinery wastes. New Cell Mol Biotechnol J. 2013;3(9):91-9. [Persian] [Link]
23. CR Suresh Chander, T Lohitnath, DJ Mukesh Kumar, PT Kalaichelvan. Production and characterization of biosurfactant from bacillus subtilis MTCC441 and its evaluation to use as bioemulsifier for food bio – preservative. Adv Appl Sci Res; 2012; 3(3):1827-31. [Link]
24. Arabian Hossein Abadi H, Rashedi H, Amoabediny G, Mazaheri Asadi M. Purification of rhamnolipid using colloidal magnetic nanoparticles. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(13):3097-106. [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.