Volume 9, Issue 4 (2018)
JMBS 2018, 9(4): 517-523 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rahnemoun B, Hatami Maleki H, Mohammadi R. Genetic Variability in Different Accessions of Agropyron Based on Morphological Traits. JMBS 2018; 9 (4) :517-523
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-24439-en.html
URL: http://biot.modares.ac.ir/article-22-24439-en.html
1- Plant Production & Genetics Department, Agriculture Faculty, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran
2- Plant Production & Genetics Department, Agriculture Faculty, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran, University of Maragheh, Daneshgah Boulevard, Madar Square, Maragheh, East Azerbaijan province, Iran. ,hatamimaleki@yahoo.com
3- Branch for Northwest & West Region, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education & Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz, Iran
2- Plant Production & Genetics Department, Agriculture Faculty, University of Maragheh, Maragheh, Iran, University of Maragheh, Daneshgah Boulevard, Madar Square, Maragheh, East Azerbaijan province, Iran. ,
3- Branch for Northwest & West Region, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education & Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz, Iran
Abstract: (9562 Views)
Aims: The perennial grass is one of important grassland plants, which have special importance based on their feeding production, protection, and prevention of soil erosion. One of the important genera of the wheat family is the Agropyron. The aim of this study was to evaluate genetic variability in different accessions of Agropyron based on morphological traits.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental research, 31 populations belonging to the 3 species of the Agropyron were evaluated in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications in research farm of Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Northwest and West region of Iran. The cluster analysis was performed by SPSS 17, using Euclidean space and UPGMA and the principal components analysis was performed through trait correlation coefficient matrix and Minitab 14 software.
Findings:
The highest value of phenotypic coefficient of variation was seen in traits, including panicle length, fresh forage yield in the first cutting, and dry matter yield in the first cutting, respectively. In the second component, seed yield and crown diameter were the most important in explaining this component. There were significant differences between different populations in terms of morphological traits, so that for these traits, the various species in this genus could be separated. From a morphological point of view, there was a great similarity between A. cristatum and A. desertorum.
Conclusion: Different populations of A. elongatum species could be distinguished from the populations of the A. cristatum and A. desertorum in terms of morphological traits, while utilization of molecular markers is mandatory to segregate the populations of A. cristatum and A. desertorum from each other.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental research, 31 populations belonging to the 3 species of the Agropyron were evaluated in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with 3 replications in research farm of Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Northwest and West region of Iran. The cluster analysis was performed by SPSS 17, using Euclidean space and UPGMA and the principal components analysis was performed through trait correlation coefficient matrix and Minitab 14 software.
Findings:
The highest value of phenotypic coefficient of variation was seen in traits, including panicle length, fresh forage yield in the first cutting, and dry matter yield in the first cutting, respectively. In the second component, seed yield and crown diameter were the most important in explaining this component. There were significant differences between different populations in terms of morphological traits, so that for these traits, the various species in this genus could be separated. From a morphological point of view, there was a great similarity between A. cristatum and A. desertorum.
Conclusion: Different populations of A. elongatum species could be distinguished from the populations of the A. cristatum and A. desertorum in terms of morphological traits, while utilization of molecular markers is mandatory to segregate the populations of A. cristatum and A. desertorum from each other.
Subject:
Agricultural Biotechnology
Received: 2017/04/28 | Accepted: 2017/10/24 | Published: 2018/12/21
Received: 2017/04/28 | Accepted: 2017/10/24 | Published: 2018/12/21
References
1. Mc Collum DW, Tanaka JA, Morgan JA, Mitchell JE, Fox WE, Maczko KA, et al. Climate change effects on rangelands and rangeland management: affirming the need for monitoring. Ecosyst Health Sustain. 2017;3(3):1-13. [Link]
2. Tietjen B. Jeltsch F. Semi-arid grazing systems and climate change: a survey of present modelling potential and future needs. J Appl Ecol. 2007;44(2):425-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01280.x]
3. Assadi M. A taxonomic revision of Elymus sect. Caespitosae and sect. Elytrigia (Poaceae, Triticeae) in Iran. Willdenawia. 1996;26(1-2):251-71. [Link] [DOI:10.3372/wi.26.2612]
4. Amirkhani M, Mesdaghi M, Karimabadi R. An investigation on ecological and agronomic aspects of three important grasses in Golestan National Park and vicinities. Gorgan: Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources; 2007. p. 29 [Persian] [Link]
5. Assadi M. Crossing experiment in Elymus transhyrcanus group, A new subspecies and species. Iran Journ Bot. 1994;6(2):185-96. [Persian] [Link]
6. Ashraf Jafari A, Elmi A, Bakhtiari M. Evaluation for yield quality traits in 17 genotype of Agropyron elangatum under conservation and grazing conditions. Romanian Agric Res. 2014;3(31):49-58. [Link]
7. Arghavani A, Asghari A, Shokrpour M, Mohammaddost chamanabad. Genetic diversity in ecotypes of two Agropyron species using RAPD markers. Res J Environ Sci. 2010;4(1):50-6. [Link] [DOI:10.3923/rjes.2010.50.56]
8. Rafezi A, Feizi A, Farshadfar M, Farshadfar E. Evolution studies and chromosomal analysis in some Agropyron genotypes (Agropyron elongatum L.). Annals Biol Res. [Link]
9. Cerpo DG. Man made stress in the grazing resource of the Medeiterranean region. Proc 19th EUCARPIA fodder crops Section Meeting Portugal. 2000;199-206. [Link]
10. Grant-Hoffman NM, Clements A, Lincoln A, Dollerschell J. Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) seedings in Western Colorado: What can we learn?. Manag Biol Invasions. 2012;3(2):89–96. [Link] [DOI:10.3391/mbi.2012.3.2.03]
11. Miller TR, chapman SR. Germination response of three forage grasses to different concentrations of six salts. J Range Manag. 1978;31(2):123-4. [Link] [DOI:10.2307/3897659]
12. Rafezi A. Farshadfar M. Farshadfar EA. Investigation of intra-specific variation in Agropyron elongatum L. using biochemical (proteins) marker. Iran J Rangel For Plant Breed Genet Res. 2009;16(2):247-53. [Persian] [Link]
13. Cauderon Y. Genome analysis in the genius Agropyron. Hereditas. 1996;2(Issue):218-34. [Link]
14. Farshadfar M, Farshadfar E. Genetic variation among different agropyron species based on morphological and chemical indices. J Crop Prod Process. 2004; 8(2):243-51. [Persian] [Link]
15. Mohamadi R, Majidi MM, Khayam Nekouei M, Mirlohi AF. Genetic variation of clonally propagated tall wheat grass genotypes (Agropyron elongatum). Iran J Field Crop Sci. 2010;41(2):355-64. [Persian] [Link]
16. Abdi ghazi jahani A, Zarban Haghighi A, Mirzaee Nodoushan H. Genetic study genus Agropyron and explore the possibility crosses between species to achieve the existing potentials its various species. Babolsar: Institute of Forests and Rangelands; 2007. p. 37. [Persian] [Link]
17. Moradi Alvar sh, Jafari AA, Rahmani E. Check forage yield and determination of drought tolerance indices In 22 genotypes Agropyrone elongatum in two conditions, irrigated and rainfed in north of Lorestan. 11th Congr Agron Plant Breed. 2010;758-64. [Persian] [Link]
18. Rahmani E, Jafari AA, Torkaman M. Study of yield and quality triats on 18 ecotypes of crestecd wheatgrass Agropyron cristatum L. for pasture and rangelands improvement in Lorestan province. Iran J Range Desert Res. 2006;13(1):53-61. [Persian] [Link]
19. Rahmani E, Jafari AA, Ghalanader I. Seed and hay production in 18 ecotypes of Crested wheatgrass Agropyron cristatum in cold-temperate territory of northern Lorestan. Iran J Range Desert Res. 2009;16(1):66-78. [Persian] [Link]
20. Mohamadi R, Khayam-Nekouei M, Mirlohi AF, Razmjou K. Investigation of genetic variation in tall wheat grass (Agropyron elongatum (Host) Beauv.) populations. Iran J Rangel For Plant Breed Genet Res. 2006;14(1):15-24. [Persian] [Link]
21. Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants-- salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Sci. 2003;43(1):235-1248. [Link] [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2003.1235]
22. Hatami Maleki H, Karim Zadeh G, Darvish Zadeh R, Alavi R. Eastern tobacco genetic diversity using by multivariate statistical methods. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 2012;10(1):100-6. [Persian] [Link]
23. Mohammadi R, Khayyam-Nekouei M, Mirlohi AF, Razmjoo Kh. Investigation of genetic variation in Dactylis glomerata L. populations. Iran J Rangel For Plant Breed Genet Res. 2008;16(1):14-26. [Persian] [Link]
24. Motaghi M, Najafian G, Bihamta, MR. Comparison of efficiency of multivariate statistical methods and a 2-stage screening method for selection Wheat genotypes with favorable yield potential and tolerance to water scarcity. J Agric Sci. 2010;2(1-2):39-54. [Persian] [Link]
25. Farahani E, Arzani A. Evaluation of genetic variation of durum wheat genotypes using multivariate analyses. Electron J Corp Prod. 2009;1(4):51-64. [Persian] [Link]
26. Naroui Rad MR, Farzanju M, Fanaei HR, Arjmandi Nejad AR, Ghasemi A, Polshekan Pahlevan MR. The study genetic variation and factor analysis for morphological characters of wheat native accessions of Sistan and Baluchistan. Pajouhesh Sazandegi. 2007;73:50-7. [Persian] [Link]
27. Shirvani H, Etminan AR, Safari H. Evaluation of variability and genetic parameters in morphological traits Agropyron trichophorum using multivariate statistical analysis. Int J Biosci. 2014;4(2):125-32. [Link]
28. Asghari A, Jafari AA, Shokrpour M, Mohammaddoust Chamanabad HR. Genetic variation between and within populations of Agropyron Gaertn, using RAPD markers. Iran J Rangel For Plant Breed Genet Res. 2011;18(2):143-53. [Persian] [Link]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |