1. Bao Y, Yin L, Liu L, Chen L (2020) Acid-sensitive ROS-triggered dextran-based drug delivery system for advanced chemo-photodynamic synergistic therapy. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A 108:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36800
2. Tang K, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al (2012) Delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in tumour cell-derived microparticles. Nat Commun 3:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2282
3. Al-Attar T, Madihally S V. (2020) Recent advances in the combination delivery of drug for leukemia and other cancers. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 17
4. Wei X, Liu L, Guo X, et al (2018) Light-Activated ROS-Responsive Nanoplatform Codelivering Apatinib and Doxorubicin for Enhanced Chemo-Photodynamic Therapy of Multidrug-Resistant Tumors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:17672–17684. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b04163
5. Mohd-Zahid MH, Mohamud R, Che Abdullah CA, et al (2019) Colorectal cancer stem cells: A review of targeted drug delivery by gold nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 10:973–985
6. Yan T, Cheng J, Liu Z, et al (2018) Acid-sensitive polymeric vector targeting to hepatocarcinoma cells via glycyrrhetinic acid receptor-mediated endocytosis. Mater Sci Eng C 87:32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.02.013
7. Jansook P, Ogawa N, Loftsson T (2018) Cyclodextrins: structure, physicochemical properties and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm 535:272–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.11.018
8. Mura P (2020) Advantages of the combined use of cyclodextrins and nanocarriers in drug delivery: A review. Int J Pharm 579:119181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119181
9. Tang P, Ma X, Wu D, et al (2016) Posaconazole/hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin host-guest system: Improving dissolution while maintaining antifungal activity. Carbohydr Polym 142:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.042
10. Patel MR, Lamprou DA, Vavia PR (2020) Synthesis, Characterization, and Drug Delivery Application of Self-assembling Amphiphilic Cyclodextrin. AAPS PharmSciTech 21:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-019-1572-z
11. Sitarz R, Skierucha M, Mielko J, et al (2018) Gastric cancer: Epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment. Cancer Manag. Res. 10:239–248
12. Nagaraju GP, Srivani G, Dariya B, et al (2020) Nanoparticles guided drug delivery and imaging in gastric cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol.
13. Davis ME, Chen Z, Shin DM (2008) Nanoparticle therapeutics: An emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7:771–782
14. Seynhaeve ALB, Amin M, Haemmerich D, et al (2020) Hyperthermia and smart drug delivery systems for solid tumor therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2020.02.004
15. Adeli F, Abbasi F, Babazadeh M, Davaran S (2022) Thermo/pH dual-responsive micelles based on the host–guest interaction between benzimidazole-terminated graft copolymer and β-cyclodextrin-functionalized star block copolymer for smart drug delivery. J Nanobiotechnology 20:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12951-022-01290-3/FIGURES/7
16. Shi J, Zhang H, Wang L, et al (2013) PEI-derivatized fullerene drug delivery using folate as a homing device targeting to tumor. Biomaterials 34:251–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.039
17. Jiang HL, Kim YK, Arote R, et al (2007) Chitosan-graft-polyethylenimine as a gene carrier. J Control Release 117:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.10.025
18. Yaghoubi F, Motlagh NSH, Naghib SM, et al (2022) A functionalized graphene oxide with improved cytocompatibility for stimuli-responsive co-delivery of curcumin and doxorubicin in cancer treatment. Sci Reports 2022 121 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05793-9
19. Tong X, Ga L, Ai J, Wang Y (2022) Progress in cancer drug delivery based on AS1411 oriented nanomaterials. J Nanobiotechnology 20:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12951-022-01240-Z/TABLES/2
20. Carvalho J, Paiva A, Cabral Campello MP, et al (2019) Aptamer-based Targeted Delivery of a G-quadruplex Ligand in Cervical Cancer Cells. Sci Reports 2019 91 9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44388-9
21. Rosenberg JE, Bambury RM, Van Allen EM, et al (2014) A phase II trial of AS1411 (a novel nucleolin-targeted DNA aptamer) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 32:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10637-013-0045-6
22. Yazdian-Robati R, Bayat P, Oroojalian F, et al (2020) Therapeutic applications of AS1411 aptamer, an update review. Int J Biol Macromol 155:1420–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2019.11.118
23. Ramezanpour M, Leung SSW, Delgado-Magnero KH, et al (2016) Computational and experimental approaches for investigating nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems. Biochim Biophys Acta - Biomembr 1858:1688–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.02.028
24. Hathout RM, Metwally AA, Woodman TJ, Hardy JG (2020) Prediction of Drug Loading in the Gelatin Matrix Using Computational Methods. ACS Omega 5:1549–1556. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03487
25. Van Gunsteren WF, Bakowies D, Baron R, et al (2006) Biomolecular modeling: Goals, problems, perspectives. Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed. 45:4064–4092
26. Akyuz L (2020) An imine based COF as a smart carrier for targeted drug delivery: From synthesis to computational studies. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 294:109850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.109850
27. Ghadri Z, Raissi H, Shahabi M, Farzad F (2020) Molecular dynamics simulation study of Glycine tip-functionalisation of single-walled carbon nanotubes as emerging nanovectors for the delivery of anticancer drugs. Mol Simul 46:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2019.1679363
28. Ghadari R, Kashefi A (2019) Amino Acid Functionalized Single−Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Thermoresponsive Drug Delivery Systems: A Computational Study. ChemistrySelect 4:1516–1524. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201803120
29. Ghadari R, Sabri A (2019) In silico study on core-shell pseudodendrimeric glycoside structures in drug delivery related usages. Polyhedron 160:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLY.2018.12.013
30. Ghadari R (2017) Nitrogen doped nanographene structures; study on the adsorption of nucleobases, nucleotides, and their triphosphate derivatives using mixed docking, MD, and QM/MM approaches. J Chem Phys 146:44105. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4974088
31. Ghadari R, Kashefi A (2017) A computational study on the usability of amino acid-functionalised nitrogen-doped graphene oxides as temperature-responsive drug delivery systems. Int J Hyperth 33:785–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2017.1308020
32. Ghadari R (2016) A study on the interactions of amino acids with nitrogen doped graphene; docking, MD simulation, and QM/MM studies. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:4352–4361. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp06734k
33. Zhang S, Bellinger AM, Glettig DL, et al (2015) A pH-responsive supramolecular polymer gel as an enteric elastomer for use in gastric devices. Nat Mater 14:1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4355
34. Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, et al (2012) Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminform 4:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-4-17
35. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, et al (2009) Gaussian 09. Gaussian 09 (Rev. D01), Gaussian, Inc., Wallingfor
36. Felegari Z, Monajjemi M (2015) AIM and NBO analyses on the interaction between SWCNT and cyclophosphamide as an anticancer drug: A density functional theory study. J Theor Comput Chem 14:1550021. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219633615500212
37. Vosko SH, Wilk L, Nusair M (1980) Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can J Phys 58:1200–1211. https://doi.org/10.1139/p80-159
38. Stephens PJ, Devlin FJ, Chabalowski CF, Frisch MJ (1994) Ab Initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J Phys Chem 98:11623–11627. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100096a001
39. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21334
40. Case DA, Cerutti DS, Cheatham TE, et al AMBER 2017
41. Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, et al (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 25:1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20035
42. Wang J, Wang W, Kollman PA, Case DA (2006) Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations. J Mol Graph Model 25:247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmgm.2005.12.005
43. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, et al (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.445869
44. Adcock SA, McCammon JA (2006) Molecular dynamics: Survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem. Rev. 106:1589–1615
45. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1987) Computer simulation of liquids. Clarendon Press
46. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
47. Genheden S, Ryde U (2015) The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 10:449–461. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
48. Miller BR, McGee TD, Swails JM, et al (2012) MMPBSA.py : An Efficient Program for End-State Free Energy Calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 8:3314–3321. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300418h
49. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
50. Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: Multiple Ligand–Protein Interaction Diagrams for Drug Discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51:2778–2786. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci200227u
51. Hildebrandt B, Wust P, Ahlers O, et al (2002) The cellular and molecular basis of hyperthermia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43:33–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(01)00179-2
52. Jones JE (1924) On the Determination of Molecular Fields. II. From the Equation of State of a Gas. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 106:463–477. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1924.0082